home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: hydra.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE!rawneiha
- From: rawneiha@hydra.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE (Philipp Boerker)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: doubling pixels horizontally
- Date: 19 Feb 1996 15:27:57 GMT
- Organization: Technical University Berlin, Germany
- Message-ID: <4ga4tt$pdf@brachio.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE>
- References: <4f4ibc$gl9@news.cs.tu-berlin.de> <591.6610T1165T2102@login.eunet.no><1045.6611T753T2256@vip.cybercity.dk><4faoe1$47@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de><2991.6612T1034T625@vip.cybercity.dk><576.6613T1070T1730@login.eunet.no><1257.6614T57T922@vip.cybercity.dk> <1225.6615T1229T800@login.eunet.no> <1140.6616T51T1538@vip.cybercity.dk> <1982.6617T1096T103@ifi.uio.no>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hydra.zrz.tu-berlin.de
-
- ludvigp@ifi.uio.no (Ludvig Pedersen) writes:
-
-
- >He used a SCRAMBLED buffer and the source code was extremly hard to
- >understand. (In my opinion this was the worst source I have ever seen!)
-
- The source was really weired! But there was a linear version too.
-
- >This routine was released here at "comp.sys.amiga.programmer"
-
- Hm, I missed that one...
-
- >Anyway, some time ago some friends of mine and I rewrote the algorithm.
- >And made the code 30-40% faster. Now it is just as fast as to copy
- >5120 (160*128/4) longwords to chipram. (Try to beat that!)
-
- Hm, I failed to reach copyspeed. My algo takes 6 c/pixel for the conversion;
- pipelining, dbf and loading of the pixels make it 8.75 c/pixel. Still,
- when I time it I get only 60% of max. speed (pixels*8.75=30,000,000)
-
- greets,
- Phil.
- grond/matrix
-
-